Epistemic Ingemination

:: Art, Science, Politics, Humor, Geekery: Randy Kirchhof's Weblog

NOTE: this blog is no longer active as of 12/07. New one: http://blog.kirchhof.com

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

Home Page   MySpace Page    Shelfari Page   Tips, Rants, etc: E-mail Randy


(Check this to have all links open in a new window.)

Fri, 30 Sep 2005

Well Put

Every once in a while, someone writes something succinct, clear, and spot-on. It's very refreshing. Publius over at Legal Fiction has such a post today. Here's a snippit:

What makes DeLay's scheme so particularly foul - and what makes it appropriate for prosecution - was it was entirely about tampering with and subverting rules governing the voting process. He cheated to raise money to elect those who would then illegally gerrymander Texas. The entire enterprise was about ignoring the ex ante rules governing the voting process - rules that (in a two-party state) solve the collective action problem that would otherwise undermine that process.

Granted, there's nothing inherently better about redistricting every 10 years as opposed to every 2 years. The point is that 10 years was the ex ante rule - and mutually agreed-upon ex ante rules (like in baseball) allow the game to be played. DeLay tossed those rules aside arrogantly and even proudly. In doing so, he initiated a gerrymandering race to the bottom in which every party in power now had incentives to gerrymander districts whenever they had a bare majority. And predictably, the race to the bottom has now spread to other states. And our democracy is the worse for it. [On as aside, this is exact same reason why holding votes open in the House and other nonsense is not just wrong, but fundamentally undermines our democratic system.]

Again, it's not so much that they illegally funneled $200,000 of corporate cash to Texas candidates. It's the principle. There's a slippery slope problem here. If DeLay succeeded in evading this law without any consequences, what would stop him from breaking other laws? What would stop others from doing the same? There's a broader message that Earle is sending here and that message is leave the democratic process alone. Reward your cronies, get your pork - do all the things that elected officials like to do. But don't screw with the voting process - that is off-limits.

Posted at 11:14 by Randy Kirchhof   [Permalink]   [Reload all]   [E-mail]


And Now For Something Completely Different

Poker
Championship

I have registered to play in the
Online Poker Blogger Championship!

This event is powered by PokerStars.

Registration code: 3087034

Posted at 11:03 by Randy Kirchhof   [Permalink]   [Reload all]   [E-mail]