NOTE: this blog is no longer active as of 12/07. New one: http://blog.kirchhof.com
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
A Very Happy New Year to one and all. I hope that 2006 is your best year ever.
Posted at 22:29 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Hey gang, in for a busy weekend. Playing w/ the Calico Kings tonight at Cedar Street & a private party tomorrow. Also up to my ears in techy stuff as well. So no rants for the time being... I guess that saving the world will have to wait until next year....
But after the first of the year, it's very likely that I'll be changing the blog software that I use over to Scoop. It's a full featured content management system, kind of skewed towards blogging. It'll allow people to make accounts, post comments, rant back, etc. Lots of the big guys use it, most notibly Kos. If it can handle his load, I imagine that it can take the two repeat visitor a month that I get. :)
Have a great weekend, and be careful out on the roads. You may be an excellent driver. Doesn't matter. They are out to kill us.
Posted at 15:23 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
This is exactly right.
What this country needs is an unapologetic, principled liberal party that doesn't look at polls before they say what they believe.
All the current party in power can do is try to scare you, take your rights, and vote themselves more money.
Posted at 21:05 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
I have a gift for ya!
I've been working on a fresh Tex-Mex salsa recipe, tweaking it for, well, literally months. It's pretty good now, and I think that it's time to release it into the wild and let it evolve. All I ask is that if you improve it, shoot me back the changes!
Here you go:
800g fresh *ripe* tomatoes, seeded. (Cut in half horizontally and squeeze to seed. Romas work great.) Best, Easiest Hot Salsa Fresca Ever (In My Kitchen, Anyway)
400g fresh yellow onion
80 g fresh jalapeno peppers, seeded
20 g fresh garlic cloves
20 g fresh cilantro, leaves only; avoid stalks if you can, they're bitter.
10 g celery stalk (Yup, celery. Just a bit. It brings out the garden in everything else.)
1 tbsp Kosher salt (Or regular. Whatever. Non-iodized.)
1 tbsp freshly ground black pepper
1 tsp sugar
Juice of one large lime (...Or two medium...)Mince and mix it all together with a cake mixer, blender, or food-processor. These portions make about a liter/quart & a half.
Notes:
- I use metric here 'cause I have a digital kitchen scale (15 bucks at Target when on sale) that reads in fractions when in Averdupois mode (...and I incidentally maintain that any measuring system that can express something in "furlong-stones per fortnight" is antiquated at this late date. :) But you'll note that the recipe is pretty geometric. (1, 1/2, 1/10th, 1/40th, 1/80th.) 800 grams of tomatoes is about 1.75 lbs, and seeds will account for about 20% of the weight (I think.) Or try it measuring by volume, I bet it'd be fine. It's not super critical.
- If you chop the tomatoes first and immediately mix in the lime juice, it'll retain its color well. Taste isn't affected in any case, but it will darken a bit without the prompt anti-oxidation of the lime juice.
- Also, note that a lot of the heat in this sauce comes from the garlic. Raw garlic is "bottom of the tongue" spicy, and hotter than you think; capsaicin in the jalapenos is "top of the tongue" hot. Play w/ the ratio between the two to adjust the heat to your liking. As written, this is a pretty hot salsa, assuming that you use real jalapenos and not those big "Caucasian grade" peppers you occasionally see these days. Serranos work too, for that matter, but they're more firey and less flavorful in my opinion. Play with it. There aren't any rules here.
Now grab a bath towel, a gallon of iced tea & some chips and commence to eating. You'll need the bath towel. Fridge it overnight for a more definite garlic/cilantro flavor.
-=- Bonus recipe: get a pound of sirloin tips, brown, cover with this salsa, and lightly simmer for a couple or three hours for a great Carne Guisada.
-=- Bonus secret discovered over the course of this process: capsaicin is fat soluble, not water soluble. If you coat your hands lightly with olive or cooking oil, you can wash it off with detergent and have much less worry about the "rub the eye (or worse) with the jalapeno hand" effect.
Enjoy, friends; let me know if you improve upon it.
And a very, very Happy New Year to You and Yours!
[Addendum: in response to overwhelming demand for.... well okay, one perplexed email, it's my understanding that the heat in garlic comes from sulphuric acid, and it affects every cell that it touches. Hence the "bottom of the tongue" turn-o-phrase. It's a remarkable effect when noted. Capsaicin, on the other hand, attaches to fat cells in your taste buds, which are pretty much on top, and is hard to dislodge - that's where its heat comes from. If you need to recover from a nuclear taco, swishing around buttermilk works way, way better than water or beer.
<*clink*> To Science!]
[Another addendum: I simplified this and improved it a few months later.]
Posted at 23:45 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Let's revisit S.J. Resolution 23:
S. J. RES. 23
JOINT RESOLUTION
To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States. Whereas, on September 11, 2001, acts of treacherous violence were committed against the United States and its citizens; and
Whereas, such acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad; and
Whereas, in light of the threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by these grave acts of violence; and
Whereas, such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States; and
Whereas, the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism against the United States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for Use of Military Force'.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.
(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
(b) War Powers Resolution Requirements-
(1) SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION- Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
(2) APPLICABILITY OF OTHER REQUIREMENTS- Nothing in this resolution supercedes any requirement of the War Powers Resolution.
Passed the Senate September 14, 2001.
Attest:
Secretary.
107th CONGRESS
There are a couple of things here.
First, Tom Daschle nixed the addition of phrasing that would allow operations in the United States:
"Literally minutes before the Senate cast its vote, the administration sought to add the words 'in the United States and' after 'appropriate force' in the agreed-upon text," Daschle wrote. "This last-minute change would have given the president broad authority to exercise expansive powers not just overseas -- where we all understood he wanted authority to act -- but right here in the United States, potentially against American citizens. I could see no justification for Congress to accede to this extraordinary request for additional authority. I refused."
So, children, the Congress specifically did not authorize these operations within the borders of the United States.
Second, note that this specifically refers to "all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed or aided" the Sept. 11 attacks.
"He determines."
Two fateful words. I can't think of any more sweeping carte blanche since the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.
Both are bad law. Both were passed in the heat of emotion. Both have done untold damage to our country.
I wish that we would learn.
Posted at 14:26 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
This just in from the National Journal:
By a vote of 56 to 44, the Senate failed to stop debate on the '06 defense appropriations bill with the ANWR drilling provision attached.It now returns to conference, where members will likely strip the ANWR plank from the text and resubmit it for a vote.
Better late than never, I guess. Nice to see some huevos growing on the minority side. Patriot Act, now ANWR. Good enough. Maybe after the election, we can see a GWB perp walk.
Posted at 15:18 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Is lying about a blow job more impeachable than subverting the Constitution, acting like a dictator, illegally spying on citizens and ignoring the law?
I'd really like to hear from all of you Kool-aid drinkers out there. And if you want to give the "we're at war" argument, please give me a reference to the applicable Declaration Of War passed by the Congress of the United States of America. Your argument will still be specious, but at least you'll be able to cite long discredited precedent.
Anyone?
Posted at 14:06 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Better Living Through Technology
Create Your Own Bush Speech. Just drag the phrases down to the open area at the bottom and press play. Slide 'em closer or further away from one another to get the rhythm. Fun for all ages.
Posted at 18:17 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Scott Bateman is on his game this weekend.
Posted at 16:06 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Thank God God Has A Sense Of Humor
Make Them Go Away.....
Posted at 05:40 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Here.
Posted at 04:48 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Friday awwwwwwwwwwww....
Prepare to go into insulin shock, it's so sweet. Cute Overload.
Posted at 14:21 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
From the National Journal's Hotline Blog:
MA. Sen. John Kerry said last night that if Dems retake the House, there's a "solid case" to bring "articles of impeachment" against President Bush for allegedly misleading the country about pre-war intelligence, according to several Dems who attended.Kerry was speaking at a holiday party for alumni of his WH '04 bid.
About 100 campaign vets gathered at Finn McCool's bar in D.C. to hear him. In a short speech, Kerry praised Dems who were working on Senate and House campaigns, and then said, according to one listener: "If we take back the House, there's a solid case to bring articles of impeachment against this president." Another listener heard a slight variation: "If we win back the House, I think we have a pretty solid case to bring articles of impeachment against this President." Kerry then quickly added, according to several in the audience, "Don't tell anyone I said that."
Kerry Comm. Dir. David Wade, in an email, said his boss was joking. [MARC AMBINDER]
Well, he might be. But there are a lot of people who might not be. I think that it's really interesting that someone with Kerry's gravitas and visibility feels free to make such a joke in public. A very good sign.
Posted at 14:14 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
I think that I like the surrealism thing.
Posted at 09:23 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Ben Stein, with whom I disagree about virtually everything (including his presumed postulate that he is better at trivia than, well, me) has written something with which I can agree wholeheartedly. Pull up a chair.
How to Feel Rich(Thanks to Andrew Tobias for the pointer.)
The secret to happiness is being grateful for everything.
By Ben Stein
My father entered Williams College in Williamstown, Massachusetts, in September 1931. The United States was entering the downswing of a small uptick at the beginning of what would be the worst industrial depression in history.
My father had an unemployed father (a former skilled tool-and-die maker) and a mother who worked as a sales clerk at a department store in Schenectady, N.Y. He had no money, no financial reserves, no social connections.
He told me of many jobs while he was at Williams, but one stays in my memory a dozen times a day, especially when I am working by traveling through a dismal, endless security line or waiting in a line to check into a hotel or noticing that my bed in my new hotel has a ripped sheet and is next to a noisy air-conditioner.
My father had a job thanks to a kindly man named Taylor Ostrander at a fraternity called Sigma Psi. My father's job was to wash dishes in the basement of the frat house as the other boys finished their lunches and dinners. (One of the boys, Richard Helms, went on to be director of the C.I.A., but that's another story.) He toiled down there at a huge sink, with steam rising and detergent getting on his unimaginably soft hands. He wore a stocking cap to keep his already curly hair from going crazy.
It was the 1930's, and Jews weren't allowed in any fraternity at Williams. Many years later, maybe in the 1980's, by which time my father had become a major economist and public policy discussant, I asked him if he felt angry about having to wash dishes to pay his way through school in a fraternity that didn't admit Jews. "Not at all," he said. "I didn't have the luxury of feeling aggrieved. I was just grateful to have a job so I could go to one of the best schools in the country."
I think that this was the secret ingredient - aside from astonishing intelligence and versatility - in my father's success and happiness. He did not feel that he had the luxury of feeling aggrieved. He was just grateful to have a chance. Or, I can say, he was grateful for the opportunities he had been given. I think about this in other situations, too. A few days ago, on a United Airlines flight from San Francisco to Denver, a group of flight attendants gathered near my seat in the last row of first class. One was either wearing or displaying a perfume I was allergic to, and I went into a wild asthmatic attack in which I could simply not breathe for an uncomfortable amount of time.
When I revived, I thought of lodging a complaint and throwing a fit. But then I thought: "Well, these poor people. Think of what United employees are going through. I am just grateful I have a job. Why torture them any more than they are already tortured?"
I was on my way to another job. I got to the next stop in my journey, Baltimore, and my driver could not recall where he had left the car. We had to have the airport police find it for us. He also did not know his way from Baltimore to Washington. (I am not kidding.) Exhausted as I was, I had to guide him all of the way. Never mind. I was grateful that I was in a car with a driver and on my way to a superimportant gig. This man was probably about where my father was in 1931. I decided not to pick on him.
Now, I have found that I cannot predict the stock market except over very long periods. I cannot tell you when the housing bubble will burst - only that it will burst. I cannot tell you when the dollar will stop rallying - only that it will stop. So I cannot tell you anything that, in a few minutes, will tell you how to be rich.
But I can tell you how to feel rich, which is far better, let me tell you firsthand, than being rich. Be grateful. Be grateful you have a job, even if it takes you to the world's worst airport, Dulles, and to the world's worst security lines, also at Dulles.
Be grateful you have a job to travel to, even if you must travel to a hotel room where the previous tenant was a cigar tester for Fidel Castro. (But do ask for another room.) Be grateful about everything and you'll feel a lot richer than the billionaires I know who are always moaning about everything that happens and who lament, like King Canute, that they cannot control the waves of the market or the business cycle.
When I got to Washington with my novitiate driver, I rested. The next day, I spoke to about 250 kids, perhaps ages 5 to 15, about how grateful the nation was to them. Their fathers had died in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and in training accidents. They were as good, brave, intelligent and yet haunted-looking as any kids I have ever met. Be grateful for their sacrifice and that your son or daughter is not one of them.
Then I spoke to about 500 widows, widowers, mothers, fathers, fiancees of men who had been killed in the war on terror. They were totally devoted to one another and to helping one another through their grueling losses. They were probably the most spiritually fit, unselfish human beings I have ever met. One showed me the contents of his son's wallet when his son was killed. A dollar bill still had a blood stain on it. The father cried when he showed it to me. Be grateful that the armed forces of this country have such brave families.
As I told them, we could do without Hollywood for a century. We could not do without them and their sacrifice for a week. Gratitude. As my pal Phil DeMuth says, it's the only totally reliable get-rich-quick scheme. Gratitude. Losing the luxury of feeling aggrieved when, if you look closely, you have an opportunity. My father washed dishes at the Sigma Psi house so that he could build an education and a life for the family he did not even have yet.
At my house, I always insist on doing the dishes, and I feel a thrill of gratitude for what washing a dish can do with every swipe of the sponge. Wiping away the selfishness of the moment, building a life for my son. The zen of dishwashing. The zen of gratitude. The zen of riches. Thanks, Pop.
Posted at 11:47 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
If you think that freedom is a pretty good thing, and would prefer not to live in a police state, I invite you to consider the following:
The White House is pressuring Congress to reauthorize a new version of the Patriot Act that is worse than the original law and doesn't include needed reforms. This could come before the Senate as soon as Thursday.A bipartisan group of senators have agreed to fight the Patriot Act, by filibuster if necessary.
This is a huge moment. Senators from both parties are standing together to protect freedom and liberty -- and they're ready to fight. Can you sign this petition to show them and the rest of the Senate that you support filibustering this bad bill? The Patriot Act has to be stopped until it includes reforms.
Posted at 16:54 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
$204.4billion The cost to the US of the war so far. The UK's bill up until March 2005 was #3.1 billion
2,339 Allied troops killed
98 UK troops killed
30,000 Estimated Iraqi civilian deaths
0 Number of WMDs found
8 per cent of Iraqi children suffering acute malnutrition
$35.819m World Bank estimated cost of reconstruction
53,470 Iraqi insurgents killed
67 per cent Iraqis who feel less secure because of occupation
$343 Average monthly salary for an Iraqi soldier. Average monthly salary for an American soldier in Iraq: $4,160.75
66 journalists killed in Iraq. Journalists killed during Vietnam war: 63
5 foreign civilians kidnapped per month
47 per cent Iraqis who never have enough electricity20 casualties per month from unexploded mines
20 per cent Inflation rate 2005
25-40 per cent Estimated unemployment rate, Nov 2005
251 Foreigners kidnapped
70 per cent of Iraqi's whose sewage system rarely works
183,000 British and American troops are still in action in Iraq. There are 162,000 US troops and 8,000 British with 13,000 from other nations
90 Daily attacks by insurgents in Nov '05. In Jun '03: 8
82 per centIraqis who are "strongly opposed" to presence of coalition troops
15,955 US troops wounded in action
For What?
Posted at 12:41 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Joe Liebermann Appreciation Day?
*Snort*
How about "Let's generate traffic on the Bull Moose Blog" day? Maybe he is pondering starting to sell ads, and needs the stats. A most un-Bull Moose like thing to do. He may admire T.R., but he ain't no T.R.
I herewith put an asterisk beside everything nice that I've ever written about him.
Pul-ease.
Posted at 16:14 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
This is the only place that you're likely to see this headline anytime soon...
Posted at 15:56 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Why Costco Is Better Than Wal-Mart.
Posted at 14:27 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
Despardes has a reprint of a Stratfor analysis that I find to be very interesting. Essentially, the premise is that Washington is going to be preoccupied with scandals for the next year or two, and when the cat's away, the mice (read: the rest of the world) will play.
Worth a few moments of your time, if only to remind us that we don't live in a vacuum. Article over here.
Posted at 11:43 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]
'Nuff said:
Justice Department lawyers concluded that the landmark Texas congressional redistricting plan spearheaded by Rep. Tom Delay (R) violated the Voting Rights Act, according to a previously undisclosed memo obtained by The Washington Post. But senior officials overruled them and approved the plan.The memo, unanimously endorsed by six lawyers and two analysts in the department's voting section, said the redistricting plan illegally diluted black and Hispanic voting power in two congressional districts. It also said the plan eliminated several other districts in which minorities had a substantial, though not necessarily decisive, influence in elections.
"The State of Texas has not met its burden in showing that the proposed congressional redistricting plan does not have a discriminatory effect," the memo concluded. The memo also found that Republican lawmakers and state officials who helped craft the proposal were aware it posed a high risk of being ruled discriminatory compared with other options.
Posted at 09:05 by Randy Kirchhof [Permalink] [Reload all] [E-mail]