Epistemic Ingemination

:: Art, Science, Politics, Humor, Geekery: Randy Kirchhof's Weblog

NOTE: this blog is no longer active as of 12/07. New one: http://blog.kirchhof.com

Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

Home Page   MySpace Page    Shelfari Page   Tips, Rants, etc: E-mail Randy


(Check this to have all links open in a new window.)

Thu, 19 Oct 2006

Sorry, Kinkster

New Zogby is out:

Rick Perry: 37.5%
Chris Bell: 26.2%
Kinky: 13.2%
Keeton-McClellan-Rylander-Strayhorn-er-Keeton: 13%

I've supported the Kinky campaign, enthusiastically and from the start as a vehicle to get issues to the forefront that otherwise would be ignored. In that context, he has run a very successful campaign. And I think that he would make an entertaining if ineffective governor (and "ineffective" is not a bad thing here; it's much preferable to "incompetent and self serving," which is our current state.) I was a true believer, and for the most part I've not been disappointed in my chosen candidate.

But it's gut-check time: Kinky Can Not Win. It's over.

Happily, though, the Texas Democratic Party has finally stepped up to the plate after a decade of tossing clowns into the shark tank and fielded a competent and savvy candidate that can go toe-to-toe with the Tom Delay/Dubya machine in Texas.

Chris Bell has the momentum, the money, and the burgeoning name recognition now to take it all, and he has my support. If half of Kinky's camp and half of Grandma's camp give their vote to Bell—and that is doable—Texas will have a competent and progressive governor who can start to disassemble the good 'ol boy corruption machine, even if outnumbered by vestigial obstructionist yahoos in every other elected office.

And really; stop for a minute and think. If a Katrina hits Houston, would you rather have a witty musician/writer or an experienced public policy administrator at the helm?

Don't get me wrong. I love Kinky and I believe that he has done a tremendous service to this state by simply running. He turned it into a race for the first time since Ann Richards. I've done benefits for him, I've blogged about him, I've talked him up. If I thought that he had a chance, I'd still be riding that train. But Kinky's shot is over—in no small part due to his abysmal performance in the debate—and the other good guy, a genuinely competent and proven candidate, has a real chance to get in there and represent the interests of the citizens who don't have a voice in their current government.

I urge all of you to think about it. If you're passionate about Kinky, cool. Vote for Kinky. He is a smart, great guy who has revitalized the better portion of our disenfranchised electorate. Good for him. You can be a part of an amusing political footnote this election year, and we can all do yet another cycle of GoodHair McDubya and the Tom Delay Players.

However, if you're passionate about political change in this state, I'd like to suggest that there is an excellent alternative candidate available to you, one who actually has a shot. One who might end up representing your views and make a difference. That candidate is Chris Bell.

Posted at 07:10 by Randy Kirchhof   [Permalink]   [Reload all]   [E-mail]